Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
* SpyderMan writes:
> If there exists a 'GNU/Hurd' other than Debian, why the debate over
> Debian release demands? If not, why the worry about Debian GNU/Hurd
> becoming incompatible.
Because someone, in this case Marcus, will have to keep two different
versions supported. I doubt that anyone wants this. It would be
like having Debian have its own libc that is totally incompatible with
the official one.
> I take it from what you write here that Debian GNU/Hurd is not the
> 'official' version, simply a distro of an official version. Where is
> this official version? CVS? alpha.gnu.org?
There is none, nobody said that there was one. We are hoping the
Debian GNU/Hurd will become the official one. Debian GNU/Hurd is the
_only_ distribution of the GNU/Hurd system currently though.
Alfred M. Szmidt
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org