Re: firewalling capabilities / release criteria
"John H. Robinson, IV" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> a nice, published ``release criteria'' (ie: all of base+standard, theses
> optional packages, and 75% of the remnainder (or their functionality),
> an rbuilder for security updates, and this that and the other thing)
> would be a boon for porters.
I don't think we need much more than that than we already have.
I mean, have you asked porters? Do you hear us crying out for such a
document? Why do you think it would be helpful?
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org