Re: where do NEW packages go?
Steve Langasek <email@example.com> writes:
> Those who argue that libexec must be added to the Hurd and BSD ports
> because it exists in other BSD (and Hurd?) distributions seem to be
> ignoring the fact that, at least in the past, the majority of Linux
> distributions *also* used /usr/libexec, despite its absence from the
I would be interested to know why it fell into disuse. A google for
libexec only turned up hundreds of copies of the GSC and random
irrelevent mailing lists. I have also not found much about the
origins or original rationale behind libexec either.
> But compatibility concerns alone are not sufficient to override
> Policy, though they may be taken as a reason to amend Policy.
Source compatibility with the BSDs would be a worthy goal. As an
upstream maintainer, I have had to add libexec support for BSD ports,
so enabling it for Debian would just be a matter of a configure option
or a make flag setting. It would save unnecessary patching of
software originating from BSD and vice versa.
** Registration Number: 151826, http://counter.li.org **
Need Epson Stylus Utilities? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com