Re: Filing Hurd-porting patches in the BTS or upstream? (was: where do...)

[Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>]

Moin James!
James Morrison schrieb am Sunday, den 19. May 2002:

>    v) serious or critical: usually porting fixes don't fix or add security 
> holes, and GNU/Hurd isn't in testing yet, so these shouldn't be RC bugs.

Yet another issue - could we make some sub-versions of the "serious"
severity? Todays, it is only called "Serious policy violation" in the
BTS, which is not true in this case.

I wish following tags that can be combined with "serious", that also
mark the bug-report as non-RC:

 - veto  (Desc.: "maintainer stoped the package from entering testing")
 - ports (Desc.: "minor portability problems")

Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
-- 
Vielleicht sollten alle ihre Web-Seiten ausdrucken
und von innen gegen die Fensterscheiben kleben?
Dann würde man wieder mehr spazieren gehen...
                    -- "Pale Male" in heise online


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org