[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: where do NEW packages go?

On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 06:39:34PM +1200, Philip Charles wrote:
> > > > Having /hurd has nothing to do with FHS.  You can have FHS, as well as having
> > > > /hurd.
> > But what if the kernel makes use of it?  Should the kernel be considered
> > software, for this definition?
> Was the Hurd considered when the standard was drawn up?

There's a more general chicken-and-egg problem too: the FHS isn't supposed
to be changed until there's some existing practice to change too; but
otoh it forbids people from introducing new top-level hierarchies to
establish existing practice...


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

     ``BAM! Science triumphs again!'' 
                    -- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: