Re: where do NEW packages go?
On Sun, 19 May 2002, Joey Hess wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > Having /hurd has nothing to do with FHS. You can have FHS, as well as having
> > /hurd.
>
> Software should never create or require special files or
> subdirectories in the root directory. Other locations in the FHS
> hierarchy provide more than enough flexibility for any package.
But what if the kernel makes use of it? Should the kernel be considered
software, for this definition?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: