Re: Virus Checking - COMPLETELY UNENCUMBERED!
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 12:02:34PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Couldn't you just redirect the output to a named pipe in the background,
> > and have the virusscanner scan that named pipe?
> Hmm. That would indeed let you scan the entire attachment. But how
> long would it take? And would you really want to let an attachment
> through if it expands into a 2 TB file? That in itself could tickle
> some clients.
(takes a mental note about thinking longer than just a few seconds...)
wouter dot verhelst at advalvas dot be
"Human knowledge belongs to the world"
-- From the movie "Antitrust"
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com