On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 12:12:04AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > The Debian maintainer cannot simultaneously meet *all* goals in cases > > like this. The question is, which is the best one to let slide. It > > seems to me that having the maintainer make a trivial one-line change > > to the source is much better than any of the other alternatives. > > Actually, the *best* thing is for someone to make an openssl > alternative that doesn't conflict with the GPL, in my opinion. Well, we've got mozilla's SSL implementation under a reasonable enough license IIRC. But most things don't support using that yet. -- Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net> Intelligent backside at large Moonchild without an opinion? Satan is skating to work tomorrow! -- Brett Manz
Attachment:
pgphSS1HzAf17.pgp
Description: PGP signature