[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libreadline

On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 12:12:04AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > The Debian maintainer cannot simultaneously meet *all* goals in cases
> > like this.  The question is, which is the best one to let slide.  It
> > seems to me that having the maintainer make a trivial one-line change
> > to the source is much better than any of the other alternatives.
> Actually, the *best* thing is for someone to make an openssl
> alternative that doesn't conflict with the GPL, in my opinion.

Well, we've got mozilla's SSL implementation under a reasonable enough
license IIRC.  But most things don't support using that yet.

Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net>      Intelligent backside at large
Moonchild without an opinion? Satan is skating to work tomorrow!
        -- Brett Manz

Attachment: pgp4Ht7AjtVKj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: