On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 12:12:04AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > The Debian maintainer cannot simultaneously meet *all* goals in cases
> > like this. The question is, which is the best one to let slide. It
> > seems to me that having the maintainer make a trivial one-line change
> > to the source is much better than any of the other alternatives.
>
> Actually, the *best* thing is for someone to make an openssl
> alternative that doesn't conflict with the GPL, in my opinion.
Well, we've got mozilla's SSL implementation under a reasonable enough
license IIRC. But most things don't support using that yet.
--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net> Intelligent backside at large
Moonchild without an opinion? Satan is skating to work tomorrow!
-- Brett Manz
Attachment:
pgphSS1HzAf17.pgp
Description: PGP signature