Re: Editor Priorities
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 03:27:07PM -0700, Grant Bowman wrote:
> * Craig Dickson <firstname.lastname@example.org> [020508 15:20]:
> > begin Wichert Akkerman quotation:
> > > Previously email@example.com wrote:
> > > > * Not free -200
> > >
> > > I still disagree with that one. We are talking about an index of the
> > > usefulness of an editor, not its license. That is a completely seperate
> > > issue.
> > I violently agree with Wichert. [...]
> What John Robinson said: non-free wouldn't be an option for something
> that gets installed on ALL systems.
The alternative priorities really have nothing to do with what gets
installed on all systems.
> While the scores may be skewed one way or the other, we are talking
> about DFSG free software.
No, we're talking about the priorities of the various editors packaged
for Debian, and what should become the default editor *when installed* -
manually if necessary.
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org