begin Wichert Akkerman quotation: > Previously m@moshez.org wrote: > > * Not free -200 > > I still disagree with that one. We are talking about an index of the > usefulness of an editor, not its license. That is a completely seperate > issue. I violently agree with Wichert. By the scores m@moshez.org posted, either vi or emacs would be strongly preferable to pico, which is insane if ease of use for users unfamiliar with Unix is of any importance at all. I don't mind non-free=-1 to allow nano to win over pico (assuming that the two score identically otherwise), but any absolute value much greater than that essentially says that political advocacy is more important than whether the user is able to get work done, which would be an arrogant, elitist, and terribly insulting attitude to take. Craig
Attachment:
pgpr3TtGw3NQM.pgp
Description: PGP signature