Re: Bug dependencies not fulfilled inside woody
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 01:45:20PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Woody not having self-consistent build-depends is what isn't a
> > bug. Debian's never done better than a rough approximation at that.
> However, the fact that we never did better than a rough approximation
> does not mean we should give up.
Nor does it mean we should waste time worrying about it for woody
though. Fixes for Build-Depends aren't interesting for woody anymore.
Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again!''
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com