Re: possible mass-filing of bugs: many shared library packages contain binaries in usr/bin
Mike Furr <firstname.lastname@example.org> immo vero scripsit:
> > There are some shared library packages that contain binaries in usr/bin
> > It is generally a bad idea, considering co-installation of
> > shared libraries with different sonames.
> I would suggest, at most, adding a lintian warning for this post-woody.
> If policy is amended(debatable) and enforcement needs to be more strict,
> one could then change this to an error condition. However, a single
> maintainer would be responsible for multiple instances of an shlib in
> most, if not all cases, so it would be at his descretion to properly
> handle this.
I'm pretty distressed that people can't find what is wrong
with having binaries in shared library packages.
They don't upgrade properly.
Fix those bugs.
email@example.com : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com