[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug dependencies not fulfilled inside woody

On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 08:36:11PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:

> On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 12:22:42PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > > Woody does not obey a certain self-consistency relationship.
> > > This is not a bug. Woody is not intended to have completely
> > > self-consistent Build-dependency relationships. [...]
> > package-does-not-build-from-source has always been considered a serious
> > bug.  Downgrade to important if you wish, but how could it be that it's
> > not a bug?
> Woody not having self-consistent build-depends is what isn't a bug.
> Debian's never done better than a rough approximation at that.

Does this mean that Adrian's last-minute "Can't fulfill the build
dependencies in woody" bugs should be downgraded?

 - mdz

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: