Re: Bug dependencies not fulfilled inside woody
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 08:36:11PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 12:22:42PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > > Woody does not obey a certain self-consistency relationship.
> > > This is not a bug. Woody is not intended to have completely
> > > self-consistent Build-dependency relationships. [...]
> > package-does-not-build-from-source has always been considered a serious
> > bug. Downgrade to important if you wish, but how could it be that it's
> > not a bug?
> Woody not having self-consistent build-depends is what isn't a bug.
> Debian's never done better than a rough approximation at that.
Does this mean that Adrian's last-minute "Can't fulfill the build
dependencies in woody" bugs should be downgraded?
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org