Re: Bug dependencies not fulfilled inside woody
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 03:28:57AM -0600, Barak Pearlmutter wrote:
> That is a good idea. Let's see what people say.
> In some sense this is a bug in woody itself, rather than in any
> particular package. Woody does not obey a certain self-consistency
> relationship.
This is not a bug. Woody is not intended to have completely
self-consistent Build-dependency relationships. Anyone who wishes to
whine about this can spend the next twelve months working through all
the problems that're stopping this from happening themselves first.
Regards,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again!''
-- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: