On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:59:37PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > Package: xbase > Version: 2.0.0-1 > Severity: normal > > xbase | 2.0.0-1 | unstable | source > xbase | 3.3.6-11potato32 | stable | all > > This seems pretty broken to me ... it's a source package, so the lower > version number doesn't cause the upgrade troubles it might otherwise do, > but it *is* confusing the BTS into thinking Branden is the maintainer of > the source package currently in unstable (hence the X-Debbugs-Cc:). > Wouldn't it be better to rename the current xbase? The BTS is brain damaged about this, too. Very convenient for the maintainer of this new "xbase" package, I will see all his bug reports. :-P FWIW, I no longer ship any package called "xbase" post-woody. However I agree that this package should change its name. -- G. Branden Robinson | Somewhere, there is a .sig so funny Debian GNU/Linux | that reading it will cause an branden@debian.org | aneurysm. This is not that .sig. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpPsUrBmPAcV.pgp
Description: PGP signature