[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packages still in Potato located

>>"Junichi" == Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp> writes:

 Junichi> We don't have a minimum policy version set as our release goal,
 Junichi> not for woody.

	That would be up to aj, of course. But this talk of policy
 versions is misleading: we have one policy (which is why it was
 frozen, instead of aj deciding on a version for the release).  Bugs
 are always reported against packages not confirming to current
 policy, conversely, you can just stick an ancient standards version
 as a kind of bug shield.

	So, if the potato packages do not have docs in /usr/share/doc,
 then it would be a RC bug (similar bugs have been filed against
 packages violating that in the past)

 "Well, Darkness has a hunger that's insatiable, And Lightness has a
 call that's hard to hear." Indigo Girls
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: