Re: Packages still in Potato located
>>"Junichi" == Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp> writes:
Junichi> We don't have a minimum policy version set as our release goal,
Junichi> not for woody.
That would be up to aj, of course. But this talk of policy
versions is misleading: we have one policy (which is why it was
frozen, instead of aj deciding on a version for the release). Bugs
are always reported against packages not confirming to current
policy, conversely, you can just stick an ancient standards version
as a kind of bug shield.
So, if the potato packages do not have docs in /usr/share/doc,
then it would be a RC bug (similar bugs have been filed against
packages violating that in the past)
manoj
--
"Well, Darkness has a hunger that's insatiable, And Lightness has a
call that's hard to hear." Indigo Girls
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: