Re: Packages still in Potato located
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 11:13:41AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Erich Schubert <email@example.com> cum veritate scripsit:
> > I think that most of these packages will have to be updated to reflect
> > all the policy changes since potato... did potato already use
> > /usr/share/doc for example?
> > Did you check which of these packages are orphaned or RFA'ed?
> We don't have a minimum policy version set as our release goal,
> not for woody.
In practice, we do to some extent. Anything before 220.127.116.11 (in terms of
actual policy compliance, not the Standards-Version: field) used
/usr/doc, which has been treated as a serious bug for woody.
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org