Re: Book listing web site? (Re: [OT] Book Recommendation: Software Architect Boot Camp)
* Karl M. Hegbloom (karlheg@microsharp.com) wrote :
> >>>>> "Thom" == Thom May <thom@debian.org> writes:
>
> Thom> * Karl M. Hegbloom (karlheg@microsharp.com) wrote :
> >> >>>>> "Thom" == Thom May <thom@debian.org> writes:
> >>
> Thom> * Karl M. Hegbloom (karlheg@microsharp.com) wrote :
> >> of the Debian developers. Granted, it's already a high traffic list,
> >> but I don't expect that query to generate more than a few responses
> >> and that those responses would prove useful to more people than just
> >> myself. Many of us enjoy reading things other than mailing lists,
> >> and are not subscribed to all of them.
> >>
> Thom> Belatedly, and only to you.
>
> How special. And back to the list, ONE MORE TIME; PLEASE END IT HERE
> UNLESS IT RELATES TO MY ORIGINAL QUESTION THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
>
Right, well, since you've now sunk to the level of including private emails
to mailling lists, which I didn't because this is not anything that
debian-devel needs to read, I feel the need to reply.
> Thom> It is not to do with the _development_ of Debian,which is
> Thom> what the list is for. Thus, it is off topic, and frankly
> Thom> crap.
>
> In what way is technical reading material not related to the
> development of Debian and Free Software?
>
When it is on a list which is busy anyway, and devoted to questions
regarding the Debian distribution. your questions are better aimed
elsewhere.
(Try, for example, open-source-developer@zork.net, but I doubt they want
you, either.)
> Thom> (And thus a perfect target for -curiosa, which is meant for
> Thom> discussions of things that would be offtopic else where but
> Thom> still interesting for debian users.)
>
> Well, sorry for the fuzz pucks. I just thought I'd interject here on
> -devel since it's likely to be the most frequented list by the sort
> of people who know what all the good books are, and what books I
> should read to get "on the same page" as the cabal.
>
TINC.
>
> Thom> Anything with OT in the title shouldn't be on -devel.
>
> Oh, then I should not have put "OT" in the title.
>
It'd still be OT.
> Thom> And I object to the "No need to be rude, Thom" line. I
> Thom> wasn't being rude. I was asking a question.
>
> Well, then I'm sorry to have rubbed your lamp the wrong way. I wish
> you would just send me a reading list and be done with it.
>
Read this, and ponder:
* debian-devel: Development of Debian
-Thom
Reply to: