Re: packages tasksel expects to find in woody, that arn't there
On Tuesday 26 February 2002 04:15, Joey Hess wrote:
> Tasksel expects to find a bunch of packages in woody that arn't there.
> This is not often a big deal; the missing packages will be silently
> skipped. That can sorta suck if it is one of the core packages in the
> task though.
[...]
>
> No mueller7-dict!
>
> Has rc bugs, and updates-excuses implies it is in the process of
> being removed.
I do have a rather dumb question concerning the mueller package: I intend to
adopt it and already retitled the bug, but now I'm not sure whether it makes
sense to do an upload, since the rc bugs seem to be resolved and
update_excuses only says: Too young, only 9 of 10 days old, (according to
madison there is no version of mueller in testing at all);
so will the package go into woody despite the fact that it has "Debian QA
Group" as maintainer?
Would it be enough to simply close the retitled ITA bug, or should I do a
regular upload (setting myself as the maintainer of course)?
Thanks for any input on this.
Regards,
Yven
--
Yven Johannes Leist - leist@beldesign.de
http://www.leist.beldesign.de
Reply to: