[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: distributable but non-free documents

> No, I am an unimpressed with the argument that standards documents must
> be regarded as sacred, unalterable texts, lest the universe collapse
> into primeval chaos.

So you are not afraid that someone will extend the RFC1149 to snails,
although it was intended for avian carriers?
I'm pretty sure that version of this essential RFC will be distributed
by lots of people...


Reply to: