Re: SPAM vs. open list
Ean Schuessler wrote:
> (At the very least we could write a script that sends non-subscribers
> back a usage agreement and holds their mail until they send back an
> affirmation to our usage policy. This would help us from a legal
> perspective as well.)
Suggestion: "non-subscribers" should be "email addresses which are not
subscribed to *ANY* Debian list". That might well reduce the number
of unrecognised emails on lists such as -devel.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Queen Mary, Univ. of London see http://people.debian.org/~jdg/
http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~jdg/ or http://www.debian.org/
Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry
Reply to: