[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: kernel-* package names

On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:05:29PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 03:32:02AM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
> > How about 'kernel-source' virtual package, that by default grabs
> > the appropriate source for your arch?
> Even if it would be possible, it would be a terrible mistake.
> The kernel sources do not provide "equivalent functionality".
> Whatever that means for source packages.

True. I was thinking more for transitional use.
Although they do all provide a kernel to run your OS on....

Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE
4th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU
The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)

Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did,
we'd be running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and
listening to repetitive music.

This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial
use, duplication and distribution.

Attachment: pgpwXQ7CdhOIw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: