Re: Protecting user changes in developer scripts handled files
Previously Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> So one would not have to add yet another dependency. However,
> this script may well be integrated into dpkg after woody, so
> this is moot.
More specifically, we're thinking of moving the meat of the conffile
handling out of dpkg into a seperate tool and make dpkg use that.
That would make it useable for others as well, and make it easier
to put another frontend (like debconf) on it.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/wichert@wiggy.net This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: