[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed virtual packages: mixer and mixer-x



On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:31:19 -0500
David B Harris <eelf@sympatico.ca> wrote:

> Hey ho :) I recently started maintaining the package gqmpeg, which was
> orphaned by Takuo KITAME.
Hey hau!

> mixer: Utility to control the input and output levels of a sound card.
> Either a command-line interface or a text/console interface is required.
> mixer-x: Utility to control the input and output levels of a sound card.
> An X11-based interface is required.
I second your proposal... but I think mixer-x is not a good name...
I think xmixer would be better... don't know, mixer-x sounds like
an specific mixer (but hey, xmixer does also...)

also... mixer is a very ordinary name... audio-mixer would avoid
name clashes, and make things easier to understand, IMO

[]s!

-- 
    Gustavo Noronha Silva - kov <http://www.metainfo.org/kov>
*---------* -+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-+
|  .''`.  | Debian GNU/Linux: <http://www.debian.org>         |
| : :'  : + Debian BR.......: <http://debian-br.cipsga.org.br>+
| `. `'`  + Q: "Why did the chicken cross the road?"          +
|   `-    | A: "Upstream's decision." -- hmh                  |
*---------* -+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-+



Reply to: