[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Getting libboost into testing

On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 05:46:52PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> One thing worries me: the old boost package built a whole bunch
> of shared libs.  The new one does not.  Is the testing script going
> to throw a fit that those packages will no longer be buildable from
> source?  

Not unless other packages depended on those libs, and haven't been updated
to work without them.

What is bad, though, is:

     * 1.26.0-2 (alpha) (latest build at Jan 23 01:36: failed)

(-3 hasn't been tried, maybe it fixes the problem) and

     + libboost-examples/mips unsatisfiable Depends: libboost-dev []
     + libboost-examples/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: libboost-dev []

Arch: all packages should *only* depend on packages that are available for
*all* architectures.


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

The daffodils are coming. Are you?
      linux.conf.au, February 2002, Brisbane, Australia
                                --- http://linux.conf.au/

Attachment: pgpVjDV9NujCT.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: