On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 05:46:52PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > One thing worries me: the old boost package built a whole bunch > of shared libs. The new one does not. Is the testing script going > to throw a fit that those packages will no longer be buildable from > source? Not unless other packages depended on those libs, and haven't been updated to work without them. What is bad, though, is: * 1.26.0-2 (alpha) (latest build at Jan 23 01:36: failed) (-3 hasn't been tried, maybe it fixes the problem) and + libboost-examples/mips unsatisfiable Depends: libboost-dev [] + libboost-examples/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: libboost-dev [] Arch: all packages should *only* depend on packages that are available for *all* architectures. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. The daffodils are coming. Are you? linux.conf.au, February 2002, Brisbane, Australia --- http://linux.conf.au/
Attachment:
pgpVjDV9NujCT.pgp
Description: PGP signature