Re: another reason why requiring NMs to be sponsored is a bad idea
On 17 Jan 2002, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Britton" == Britton <fsblk@aurora.uaf.edu> writes:
>
> Britton> I just read in DWN that there are now 30 people waiting
> Britton> for sponsors. So now we are, essentially, turning away
> Britton> volunteers.
>
> Since when have NMs been required to be sponsored?
Well DWN definately implied it was a requirement, that's how I remember
the discussion going when the idea got implemented, and NMs seem to be
understanding it as a requirement, though apparently mayby it isn't.
Britton
Reply to: