[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: another reason why requiring NMs to be sponsored is a bad idea



On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 10:16:11AM -0900, Britton wrote:

> Well DWN definately implied it was a requirement, that's how I remember
> the discussion going when the idea got implemented, and NMs seem to be
> understanding it as a requirement, though apparently mayby it isn't.

Sponsorship predates the NM process - it started because the new
maintainer queue got stalled and there was no way for people to become
developers.

-- 
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Attachment: pgpTNu732Qkkr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: