Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V102 #11
>------------------------------
>Content-Type: text/plain
>debian-devel-digest Digest Volume 102 : Issue 11
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-digest-request@lists.debian.org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@debian.org.
>Today's Topics:
> Re: bogus maintainers? [ Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org> ]
> Re: Bug#127252: -unstable compiled a [ Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@de ]
> Re: bogus maintainers? [ Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr> ]
> Re: EURO and CENT signs in the conso [ Ari Makela <hauva@arska.org> ]
> Re: EURO and CENT signs in the conso [ Ari Makela <hauva@arska.org> ]
> Re: bogus maintainers? [ Gerfried Fuchs <alfie@ist.org> ]
> Re: BitKeeper [ Stephen Zander <gibreel@debian.org> ]
> Re: BitKeeper [ tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG ]
> Re: bogus maintainers? [ Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr> ]
> Re: An alarming trend (no it's not f [ Darrell Rene Dupas <ddupasedm@netsc ]
> Re: bogus maintainers? [ Gerfried Fuchs <alfie@ist.org> ]
> Re: EURO and CENT signs in the conso [ Samuel Tardieu <sam@debian.org> ]
> Re: An alarming trend (no it's not f [ Craig Dickson <crdic@yahoo.com> ]
> Re: BitKeeper [ Peter Makholm <peter@makholm.net> ]
> Re: EURO and CENT signs in the conso [ Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann@gmx.at ]
> Re: EURO and CENT signs in the conso [ Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cis ]
> Re: Bug#127252: -unstable compiled a [ Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> ]
> Some thoughts about problems within [ Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> ]
>------------------------------
>Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 20:37:31 +0100
>From: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>
>To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-www@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: bogus maintainers?
>Message-ID: <[🔎] 20020103193731.GA660@richard.a-es2.oi>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Hi Josip!
>You wrote:
>> > > Maintainer, Unknown Kernel Package <unknown@unconfigured.in.etc.kernel-pkg.conf>
>> > > main: kernel-doc-2.4.5-r4k-kn04, kernel-source-2.4.5-r4k-kn04
>> > >
>> > > What's up with this? This is not a legitimate maintainer address IMO.
>> >
>> > Probably the script that generates this page is broken
>>
>> How the hell were you able to draw that conclusion? The script may be
>> broken, but that it would randomly insert local data into the web pages,
>> well that's just too stupid even for that script. :P
>What I meant was: the page was apparently generated from local data
>(from a local /var/lib/dpkg/available perhaps?).
>--
>Kind regards,
>+---------------------------------------------------------------+
>| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
>|--------------------------------| que l'on va faire, a quoi |
>| zoetekw@phys.uu.nl | bon le faire? |
>| bas@A-Es2.uu.nl | Pablo Picasso |
>+---------------------------------------------------------------+
>------------------------------
>Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:48:53 -0200
>From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
>To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: Bug#127252: -unstable compiled against the wrong libpng
>Message-ID: <[🔎] 20020103174852.A27055@khazad-dum>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>On Thu, 03 Jan 2002, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
>> and have created one (See 127215). From my perspective the problem
>> seems to be the libpng3 changes the dependencies of qt2 and hense kde.
>> It seems the fix is not to revert/fix libpng but to fix the qt
>> dependencies however I get the impression that frustration is setting
>Yes. Actually, we have the same problem with every library that links with
>another library that is likely to be used by an app.
>The best example is libdb*, but there are others. libtiff, libpng, libsasl,
>libz...
>You either make sure EVERYthing is linked against the same library versions
>(and good luck with binary compatibility with other distributions for
>anything that has a shared library), or you must tell any libraries that
>link to other libraries to use --symbolic dynamic linking, or you must use
>versioned symbols. Maybe there is a fourth way, but I don't know of any.
>Implementing any of the fixes is bound to be painful.
>> in. ie. did not create the bug so I should not fix it. From a user
>We actually need a Debian-wide (well, probably a LSB-wide) fix for the
>problem. The same kind of breakage is expected to hit us again and again
>until we do that.
>--
> "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
> them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
> where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
> Henrique Holschuh
>------------------------------
>Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:06:01 +0100
>From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
>To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-www@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: bogus maintainers?
>Message-ID: <[🔎] 20020103210601.C17849@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 08:37:31PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
>> > > > Maintainer, Unknown Kernel Package <unknown@unconfigured.in.etc.kernel-pkg.conf>
>> > > > main: kernel-doc-2.4.5-r4k-kn04, kernel-source-2.4.5-r4k-kn04
>> > > >
>> > > > What's up with this? This is not a legitimate maintainer address IMO.
>> > >
>> > > Probably the script that generates this page is broken
>> >
>> > How the hell were you able to draw that conclusion? The script may be
>> > broken, but that it would randomly insert local data into the web pages,
>> > well that's just too stupid even for that script. :P
>>
>> What I meant was: the page was apparently generated from local data
>> (from a local /var/lib/dpkg/available perhaps?).
>And I said it _was not_.
>The broken package really was in sid, my few-days-old sid still has it.
>It's been fixed in the meantime. The devel/people page will be regenerated
>shortly.
>--
> 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
>------------------------------
>Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:00:06 +0200
>From: Ari Makela <hauva@arska.org>
>To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: EURO and CENT signs in the console keymaps
>Message-ID: <[🔎] 20020103200006.GA30127@lagavulin.sappho.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:08:48AM +0100, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
>> I suppose swedish and danish keyboards are alike.
>I think they are almost identical. AFAIK the only difference is that
>'ä' and 'ö' have changed places on the keyboard. And, of course, the
>Danes do not use 'ö' but ø but that's a little different thing.
>Finnish and Swedish keyboards are identical as Finnish Linux users well
>know: at least Corel and RH have had several times broken Finnish
>keymaps (fi instead of the correct fi-latin1). So the Finnish users have
>used the Swedish keymaps.
>> standard. (AltGr+3 is £, AltGr+4 $ and AltGr+6 is apparently ¥ in X11, but I
>> have never seen the later drawn on any keyboard).
><aol>me neither</aol>. I must show my ignoran
*** Your message did not reach its recipient ***
It was caught by the mailing system as spam.
If this message is not spam and you feel that
this message was caught in error, please email
a note to spam_filter@netfx-2000.net.
If this message is spam, knock it off!
This server is in California where it is illegal
to spam! We do not accept spam here!
We will go after all spammers to the maximum
extent of the law!
Reply to: