Re: [Debian account] I request your attention
Michael Piefel <piefel@informatik.hu-berlin.de> writes:
> I do not like the tone Eray's mail was written in, I do not like the
> accusations I find in it. But do you really think he's so unreasonable
> when he gets impatient?
I don't think Eray is being unreasonable. I do not think it is
unreasonable that someone who has been waiting for DAM approval for
227 days (~57 times the mode) should ask for a status update.
This is not the first time that accusations have been made about the
DAM approval process[1]. In fact, discussions about DAM approval crop
up repeatedly[2]. At one time, Eray expressed his belief that these
accusations were false.[3]
Eray may not mention emailing the frontdesk (and it doesn't appear to
be publically archived, so we can't check) but he's emailed
newmaint-discuss[4] to no avail.
Yes, Debian developers are all volunteers, and you can't demand that
they do anything. But it doesn't seem unreasonable to expect a status
update within 32 weeks, even from volunteers. Especially when the
volunteers have been processing other people.
Footnotes:
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0102/msg00735.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0101/msg01656.html
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0101/msg01727.html
[4] http://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint-discuss-0103/msg00123.html
--
Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> - In a variety of flavors!
A cat's courage is as strong as the dog's chain.
Reply to: