[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: real LSB compliance



On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 08:30:29PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> 
> Those specific semantics are pretty much what I recall from SVR2
> although X wasn't an issue and run-level 5 was "firmware".
> 
> I'd quite like to see this implemented, although it would be quite
> tricky to implement from an upgrade perspective.

so implement it on your system.  don't force your preference down
everyone else's throat, forcing them to give up the custom setup they
may already have.  

runlevels should be sysadmin policy, debian's current default
facilitates that best.

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgpbsVZ3qAOqp.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: