Re: LSB specification of runlevels
Steven Hanley <sjh@svana.org> writes:
> though one command would be better I had thought, so instead of sart-service,
> stop-service, reload-service, etc
>
> control-services (start|stop|reload|etc) service-name
Why not just "service service-name (start|stop|reload|etc)"? RH has
it already (just runs scripts in /etc/init.d). It's shorter than your
alternatives and it already works elsewhere in the Linux world.
--
Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> - In a variety of flavors!
"I am Elvis of Borg (thankaverymuch). Assimilate me, tender...Assi..."
Reply to: