Re: [users] Re: Time to fight for our beloved DEB format!
Jason Gunthorpe writes:
> > In any case, it was an oversight in that none of the people who
> > reviewed the section knew that file dependencies where an issue that
>
> I reviewed it, I knew, I brought it and lots of other issues up. That
> resulted in lsb-taskforces 1 through 3 being formed, and then nothing was
> accomplished. That was in December. 6 months later the spec was published
> unchanged. What went wrong?
There is the bug tracking system which the LSB group used for the
specification review period:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=101107&group_id=1107&func=browse
I encourage you and anyone else who knows about specific problems
(like the file dependencies) to submit a bug report. This will help
ensure that it doesn't accidentally get lost.
We already have a few "rpm sux!" reports so we don't need any more of
those :-)
Chris.
--
yeohc@au1.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia
Reply to: