Re: Re: Re: LSB bastards
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001 18:14:45 -0400, Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > On 01 Jul 2001 12:31:31 +0200, Peter Makholm <peter@makholm.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > They have absolutely no rights to claim we should provide a way to
> > > > install rpm's in debian.
> > >
> > > But we allready provides a way to install RPS. Check out the alien
> > > package or the rpm-package.
> > >
> >
> > I'm sorry i forgot to say "transparent". i.e. "rpm -i foo.rpm"
>
> So, you claim the LSB requires that we should "provide a transparent way
> to install rpm's in debian"?
>
> Would you care to back that up with a link to the page of the LSB that
> says that? Oddly, I must have missed it in my several readings of that
> part of the spec.
I'm not claiming, I've read many posts here commenting the LSB requires that.
And yes there was a link (don't remember it, anyone could paste it?). But there was
no mention about "transparent installing" there as i remember so i just thought
that'd be defined in another place...
do you mean that's not what they require? It hurts me if i was confused, i'd hate
sending an inflamatory message because of a messy confusion.
Regards,
--
Robert Millan Debian GNU user
zeratul2 wanadoo es http://getyouriso.org/
--
Robert Millan Debian GNU user
zeratul2 wanadoo es http://getyouriso.org/
--
Robert Millan Debian GNU user
zeratul2 wanadoo es http://getyouriso.org/
Reply to: