Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
>>"Philip" == Philip Brown <phil@bolthole.com> writes:
Philip> As opposed to the current scheme, which also requires
Philip> "annoying manual editing of addresses" to reply to the list,
Why would you need to do that? Doesn't your MUA have a wide
reply setting?
Philip> if your mailreader does the reasonable thing and assumes you
Philip> want to reply to the original sender of the message, in liu
Philip> of a reply-to header.
If I hit the reply key, I would indeed want to reply to the
sender, rather than the whole list. Why is that not a reasonable
thing to do?
How do you suggest I reply to sender if someone scribbles all
over the reply-to header that the sender has set (in case the from
header is invalid)?
manoj
who had to edit no headers in order to send this message
--
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: