Re: at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness
From: Gerhard Tonn <GerhardTonn@swol.de>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 11:23:44 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 01122911234403.00801@tau>

Hi,
I have changed my mind and will write semi-automatically a bug report for 
each of the packages with severity grave.

I am currently rebuilding the latest version of each of the packages, so that 
a build log for s390 will be available at http://buildd.debian.org/ . I will 
then check that the problem is still there and write a bug report considering 
those who have already answered me.

Regards,
Gerhard

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>

Prev by Date: Re: visual c
Next by Date: Preparing a Proposal: 3 DD needed for every NEW package
Previous by thread: Re: at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness
Next by thread: Re: at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread