Re: Quake 2 sources GPL'd
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 00:45, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 09:51:17AM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
> > Maybe I'm splitting hairs, but I think that, at least morally, it's
> > allright to put Quake2 in main.
>
> Why not wait until there really is free data? Doesn't seem like
> much of an inconvenience.
>
> If we assumed all non-free data or software could be replaced,
> then we wouldn't need contrib at all - everything could go in
> main.
I agree.
After all the talk about how easy it will be to write quake levels I'm
surprised that the people who want Quake in main don't just knock one up
instead of putting all the effort into debating the issue... ;)
--
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Reply to: