[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]

"John H. Robinson, IV" <jhriv@ucsd.edu> writes:

> however, if it is _not_ sponsored by debian, not supported by debian,
> not approved or endorsed by debian, and does not fall in the guidelines
> of debian's guidelines of the use of debian's name/logo, then it's a no
> go.

This is of course the underlying question. I don't think it would
change anything discussing this instead of the name. It is one and the
same thing. (For me at least).

I think a windows port could be part of Debian (and then should be
named Debian something) others disagrees. It is not really the name
we're talking about with regards to Debian.

Når folk spørger mig, om jeg er nørd, bliver jeg altid ilde til mode
og svarer lidt undskyldende: "Nej, jeg bruger RedHat".
                                -- Allan Olesen på dk.edb.system.unix

Reply to: