[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Request for NMU

On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 06:44:28AM +0100, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 05:43:47PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> writes:
> > > I didn't read the whole thread. There were many suggestions, but
> > > when talking about short term solutions you have to admit that the
> > > Build-Conflicts solution to this problem is:
> > I agree it works in the short term.  In fact, it works the most
> > reliably out of all the short term solutions.  But it is the worst
> > solution in the long term, because it has the potential to break a lot
> > of packages the second a new automake hits unstable.
> It doesn't even work in the short-term, since it prohibits me from
> compiling such a package on my local machine if I have automake
> installed, which most developer have.

Nonsense.  dpkg-buildpackage has a '-d' flag to override build


by Rocket to the Moon,
by Airplane to the Rocket,
by Taxi to the Airport,
by Frontdoor to the Taxi,
by throwing back the blanket and laying down the legs ...
- They Might Be Giants

Reply to: