Re: [2001-11-29] Freeze Update

[Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>]

>>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:

    Anthony> After today, uploads of base packages should *NOT* be
    Anthony> made to unstable.

Why not?  I understand they won't make it into woody but what's wrong
with fixing bugs for woody+1 provided that invarients
about shared library dependencies aren't violated.

    Anthony> Additionally, in the next few days, boot-floppies,
    Anthony> standard, and tasks are expected to get into releaseable
    Anthony> state (ie, no RC bugs). After December 9th, standard
    Anthony> packages (or packages in tasks) which've been dropped
    Anthony> from woody won't be reinstated. 

Why can't they be reinstated at a lower priority or not as part of
tasks?