Re: www-browsers: graphic or text? (general and particular discussion)

[tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)]

Christian Surchi <csurchi@debian.org> writes:

> In particular I plan to put a dependency on virtual package
> "www-browser" just to avoid the list of all the possible browsers
> (text/graphic, no-ssl/ssl,...), but the problem is that I can't
> distinguish between graphic and text ones. Do we have a reason not to
> have two different virtual packages?

It sounds like we have a reason for a new virtual package, perhaps
"graphical-www-browser".  Someone appropriate should make a proposal
for debian-policy.