Re: python>=2.1 issues
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 10:20:37AM +0200, Baruch Even wrote:
> * Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> [011110 09:39]:
> > lyx only uses python for some scripts and does not compile any python
> > modules. Therefore, the unversioned dependency is correct. If a
> > package contains python modules, which get compiled, or if the package
> > depends on features available in one version only, the package must
> > depend on a specific python version.
>
> Ok, but why won't you upload a new package to fix this conflict? I can
> probably talk with the maintainer to upload a new package (or that I'll
> do an NMU) but the bug is in the python package and not in LyX.
I am the LyX maintainer.
As far as I can understand, this is a python bug.
Jules
Reply to: