Re: python>=2.1 issues
* Jules Bean <jules@jellybean.co.uk> [011112 14:10]:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 10:20:37AM +0200, Baruch Even wrote:
> > * Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> [011110 09:39]:
> > > lyx only uses python for some scripts and does not compile any python
> > > modules. Therefore, the unversioned dependency is correct. If a
> > > package contains python modules, which get compiled, or if the package
> > > depends on features available in one version only, the package must
> > > depend on a specific python version.
> >
> > Ok, but why won't you upload a new package to fix this conflict? I can
> > probably talk with the maintainer to upload a new package (or that I'll
> > do an NMU) but the bug is in the python package and not in LyX.
>
> I am the LyX maintainer.
>
> As far as I can understand, this is a python bug.
It's already fixed in python2.1 2.1.1-4; the erroneous conflict with lyx
was removed.
Gregor
Reply to: