Re: RFC: SDL and X static extension libraries re-revisited
Philip Blundell <email@example.com> writes:
> In message <[🔎] 20011102083359.A18174@blueberry.jellybean.co.uk>, Jules Bean writes
> >What happens if two different dynamic objects, destined to be linked
> >into the same runtime, are linked against different versions of the
> >E.g. xfoo links libfoo and libbar, two graphics related libraries.
> >They both have the capability to use DGA, so they both statically link
> >the dga lib.
> >Is that a problem?
> No, I think it should be OK. Each shared object will have its own
> entirely private copy of libXxf86dga. References to symbols in that
> library will be resolved at compile time, and the DGA stuff won't be
> visible in the external interfaces presented by libfoo and libbar.
No, there is one single symbol table and if symbol S is resolved to an
address in library A, a lookup for that same symbol will be resolved
to the same address.
What you describe is the symbolic linker mode (-B symbolic).