Re: Discussion: wnpp and ITPs
Thanks. I've checked it.
In <[🔎] 20011105181103.B2601@hopi.hostsharing.net>,
on "Mon, 5 Nov 2001 18:11:03 +0100",
with "Re: Discussion: wnpp and ITPs",
Noel Koethe <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
noel> On Die, 06 Nov 2001, Taketoshi Sano wrote:
noel> > I'm afraid that we may have many problems around
noel> > forgotten (sub-marine) ITPs or duplicate ITPs
noel> > unless we make the wnpp page more easily readable.
noel> > An idea is to split wnpp into a few types, such as
noel> > ITP/ITA(now working!) and O/RFA(need help!) in order
noel> > to make it short and more easily readable with slow
noel> > connections. Perhaps we also need to add UTP(unable
noel> > to package) category.
noel> You know the lists on
noel> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ ?
So, the classified list has already been there. Nice to see it :)
Then, the remaining problem is how to sweep the mines of
forgotten ITPs. Any ideas ?
Taketoshi Sano: <email@example.com>,<firstname.lastname@example.org>,<email@example.com>