Re: X is now broken, unbreak?
> > All of those things make it a "Priority: Normal" bug at worst, and an
> > annoyance at best.
>
> It breaks startup for the vast majority of X installations for no
> reason. It does not seem entirely unreasonable to describe a bug like
> that as release critical.
>
I guess it would come down to who is classifying things as 'critical',
'normal', etc... Personally I think that that is just an annoyance,
you'd be misleading people into thinking that something awful would
happen if they didn't upgrade RIGHT NOW, making modem users tie up their
modem for 1/2 hour to fix something that they could fix with vi.
Reply to: