Re: G++ 2 => 3 transition (was Re: GNU C++ 3.0 porting help wanted)
On Sun, 2001-10-14 at 18:04, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [Sean Middleditch Sunday 14 October 2001 05:42 pm]:
> | What about, after the freeze on Woody, no libraries usng C++ be accepted
> | into the new testing (or unstable, whatever) tree unless they are
> | compiled with gcc 3.0. All applications thus will also have to be
> | ported, since the libs they depend on will only be using gcc 3.0. We
> | would probably need two versions of the core libraries (libstdc++) for a
> | while, though.
> Unfortunately, there are some packages which won't work, to name at least two
> big ones: Mico and Kde. There is a regression between 2.95.x and 3.0.x (and
> it won't be fixed in 3.0.2 AFAIK) and those two projects don't compile
> correctly with the 3.0.x branch (see PR3909 )
>
> I think there was a discussion on gcc ml to work on this for the 3.0.3
> release.
>
We will be waiting until *after* the Woody release to attempt the
transition to gcc 3, though, right? By then I would hope thing are all
patched up. ^,^
> regards
> C.
> - --
> | Christophe Prud'homme, http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm
> | ICQ UIN: 24560867 Alias: Jesunix
> | Linux User No: 231917
> |
> | The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers.
> | -- Wm. Shakespeare, "Henry VI", Part IV
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE7ygwMoY+0C9S+FFARAi40AJwMGaIPaI/vSvd+OYhkBosCVkl4ZwCcCN8n
> S+DVhy1mX88+1XP7niIZKns=
> =e48o
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
Reply to: