[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: FYI: intent to NMU to fix SDL + static X extension library problem



On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 12:50:04PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It's hard enough to deal with such situations as it is (c.f. libdb2 v.
> libdb3), without creating more such situations against the wishes of the
> upstream developers.

Why, having everything always available as a shared library never causes
*any* problems *at all*...

libgal12 - G App Libs (run time library)
libgal13 - G App Libs (run time library)
libgal11 - G App Libs (run time library)
libgal7 - G App Libs (run time library)
libgal8 - G App Libs (run time library)
libgal9 - G App Libs (run time library)

Anyway, Philippe Troin has a long history of opposing any decision I
make for sole reason that I have made it (personal animosity), so I am
disregarding his objections for that reason on top of the technical
fallacies he has upheld to support it.

Besides which, his assertion about providing all .a's as .so's is
contradicted by the Debian Policy I amendment I referenced in my
original message, which passed without objection once we had it in
concrete form.

As usual, Philippe probably didn't bother to read much more than subject
line before objecting to my proposed course of action.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    The basic test of freedom is
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    perhaps less in what we are free to
branden@debian.org                 |    do than in what we are free not to
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    do.                  -- Eric Hoffer

Attachment: pgpAAl9sbkqfC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: