Re: PROPOSED: slight change to wnpp procedures

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: PROPOSED: slight change to wnpp procedures
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:38:46 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010927183846.3a8686fd.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010926135221.A13637@deadbeast.net>
References: <[🔎] 20010925201508.A7331@deadbeast.net> <[🔎] 20010926165429.1565d017.dancer@netfort.gr.jp> <[🔎] 20010926114014.J13130@deadbeast.net> <[🔎] 20010926204218.A28022@ysabell.wh.vaih> <[🔎] 20010926135221.A13637@deadbeast.net>

Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> immo vero scripsit

 
> Well, the bug could be reassigned to "wnpp,ftp.debian.org".  That should
> work with the current BTS without changing anything.

I think it should be kept to wnpp.

At least, so that we have a distinction between 
ITP that has been withdrawn, and an ITP that is 
going to be fulfilled.

It's about new packages, after all.
And not everything related to ftp.debian.org
needs to be at ftp.debian.org.


thanks,
	junichi


-- 
dancer@debian.org  http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PROPOSED: slight change to wnpp procedures
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

References:
- PROPOSED: slight change to wnpp procedures
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: PROPOSED: slight change to wnpp procedures
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- Re: PROPOSED: slight change to wnpp procedures
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: PROPOSED: slight change to wnpp procedures
  - From: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@debian.org>
- Re: PROPOSED: slight change to wnpp procedures
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: bind9-chroot (was: questions on ITP)
Next by Date: Re: Mounts with fs type 'none'
Previous by thread: Re: PROPOSED: slight change to wnpp procedures
Next by thread: Re: PROPOSED: slight change to wnpp procedures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread