I am seriously considering adopting doc-html-w3. I use many of these
recommendation on a daily basis where I work. It would be nice to have a
current local copy of them. However, before I decide to go any further with
the adoption process, I want to get some feedback for an idea that I have.
I would like to change doc-html-w3's name to one that is more descriptive of
its current and potential contents. I think that the name of this package is
currently too narrow; besides HTML, indicated by the name, it also contains
CSS2, SMIL, XPATH and many other recommendations. What do you think?
Here are a couple of the names I've been kicking around:
a) doc-w3 (most general, my favorite; perhaps even doc-w3c)
b) doc-markup-w3 (but this name excludes style: CSS2, XSLT, etc)
d) [your suggestion here]
Feel free to CC me, thanks.