On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 10:49:35PM -0500, Joseph Schlecht said:
> I would like to change doc-html-w3's name to one that is more descriptive of
> its current and potential contents. I think that the name of this package is
> currently too narrow; besides HTML, indicated by the name, it also contains
> CSS2, SMIL, XPATH and many other recommendations. What do you think?
As a normal user, when I see doc-html-w3, I think of html-formatted
documents about Emacs' w3 web browser. I think a name change would be
> Here are a couple of the names I've been kicking around:
> a) doc-w3 (most general, my favorite; perhaps even doc-w3c)
> b) doc-markup-w3 (but this name excludes style: CSS2, XSLT, etc)
> c) doc-w3c-recommend
> d) [your suggestion here]
doc-w3c looks best to me, but any would work as long as it is -w3c
instead of -w3.
FsckIt on openprojects.net
- From: Joseph Schlecht <firstname.lastname@example.org>